SAT Reading Scores Are the Lowest They’ve Been in 40 Years

Coming in with an average SAT reading score of 496, 2012’s graduating  seniors have the dubious distinction of having attained the worst  reading score since 1972. (For those test-takers of a certain age and  test-taking history, “reading” is actually that part we knew as  “verbal.”) Regardless of what you call(ed) it, “The average reading  score for the Class of 2012 was 496, down one point from the previous  year and 34 points since 1972,” reports the Washington Post‘s Emma Brown, gleaning numbers from the College Board, the organization that administers the test.

What’s troubling beyond the low average score is that seniors’ scores  in “writing,” a section related to “reading” and for most of us, life in some way or another, also dropped—to 488—a decrease of nine points  since the College Board started testing for it in 2006. So what gives?  Are future generations illiterate? Is the SAT too hard? As Po Bronson wrote for the Daily Beast in 2009, “It’s commonly said that the SAT, taken in a  senior year of high school, has only about a 40% correlation with a  student’s freshman year college GPA.” That line of thinking implied by  that statement is that numbers are just numbers, to some extent, and not predictors of future successes, necessarily. They are general  predictors of who will get into which colleges, though, and Bronson goes on to defend the SAT, writing, “I’ve always had a skeptical feeling  about the 40% correlation statistic, and so I’ve never relied on it or  used it in print.”

Brown writes that the reading scores may have been affected by minority test takers, who came out and took the test in record numbers: “The  declining national reading averages may in part reflect the  ever-widening pool of students who take the SAT, first administered in  1926 to a few thousand college applicants.” She continues, “More than  1.66 million graduating seniors last year took the test, the highest  number in history. Nearly half were minorities and about a quarter  reported that English was not exclusively their first language. More  than a quarter of public school test-takers — 27 percent — had family  income low enough to qualify for a fee waiver, and more than a third — 36 percent — reported that their parents had not gone to college.”

More kids taking the SAT is probably a good thing, though the sweeping  assumption that minority test takers are naturally worse than their  non-minority counterparts at the “reading” section doesn’t tell the  entire story, either. As Bronson wrote, “It’s still worthwhile to  explore why people succeed, both at school and in real life.” The  reverse is true, too.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s